Skip to content
InnoReviews

Honor X9c vs Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

WINNER
H

Honor

Honor X9c

$399

52.6Inno Score
VS
S
31.4Inno Score
30.2Performance20
64.5Display36
47.4Camera33.1
73.2Battery38.8
65.3Features38.7
14 spec wins — Honor X9c5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

InnoReviews verdict

Honor X9c wins this phone face-off, 52.6 to 31.4, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+34) and display (+29). Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Honor X9c

  • Stronger performance score: 30 vs 20
  • Stronger display score: 65 vs 36
  • Stronger camera score: 47 vs 33
  • Stronger battery score: 73 vs 39
  • Stronger features score: 65 vs 39

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

  • 60% higher Ultra-wide: 8 MP vs 5 MP
  • 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
  • 25% higher Front camera: 20 MP vs 16 MP
  • Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
  • Lower launch price: $279 vs $399

Display

Display comparison: Honor X9c versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecHonor X9cSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Screen size6.78 ″+6%6.4 ″
Panel typeOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution2700x12242400x1080
Pixel density437 ppi+6%411 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz+33%90 Hz
Peak brightness800 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: Honor X9c versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecHonor X9cSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
ChipsetSnapdragon 6 Gen 1MediaTek Helio G80
AnTuTu 10550,000+112%Top 74%260,000Top 96%
Geekbench 6 (single)950+132%Top 74%410Top 97%
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,750+108%Top 71%1,320Top 97%
RAM (max)12 GB+100%6 GB
Storage options256GB / 512GB64GB / 128GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2eMMC 5.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Honor X9c versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecHonor X9cSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Main camera108 MP+69%64 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Ultra-wide5 MP8 MP+60%
Max video4K@30fps4K@30fps
Front camera16 MP20 MP+25%
OISYesNo

Battery

Battery comparison: Honor X9c versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecHonor X9cSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Capacity6,600 mAh+32%5,000 mAh
Wired charging66 W+340%15 W

Design

Design comparison: Honor X9c versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecHonor X9cSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Weight189 g184 g+3%
Thickness8 mm+5%8.4 mm
IP ratingIP65
Frame materialPlasticPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Honor X9c versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecHonor X9cSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.15.0
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMNoNo

Software

Software comparison: Honor X9c versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecHonor X9cSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
OS at launchAndroid 14 (MagicOS 8)Android 11 (One UI 3.1)
OS update pledge3 years4 years+33%

Audio

Audio comparison: Honor X9c versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecHonor X9cSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5mm jackNoYes

Related comparisons

Try another matchup