Honor X9c vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
30.2Performance65.6
64.5Display57.5
47.4Camera44.1
73.2Battery47.3
65.3Features94.7
6 spec wins — Honor X9c8 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 wins this phone face-off, 58.9 to 52.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+35) and features (+29). Honor X9c still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Honor X9c
- Stronger display score: 65 vs 58
- Stronger camera score: 47 vs 44
- Stronger battery score: 73 vs 47
- 164% higher Wired charging: 66 W vs 25 W
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- Lower launch price: $399 vs $1,100
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
- Stronger performance score: 66 vs 30
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 65
- 273% higher AnTuTu 10: 2,050,000 vs 550,000
- 198% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 8,200 vs 2,750
- 147% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,350 vs 950
Display
| Spec | Honor X9c | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.78 ″ | 6.9 ″+2% |
| Panel type | OLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2700x1224 | 1080x2520 |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi+10% | 397 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 88 % |
Performance
| Spec | Honor X9c | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
| AnTuTu 10 | 550,000Top 74% | 2,050,000+273%Top 11% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 950Top 74% | 2,350+147%Top 14% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,750Top 71% | 8,200+198%Top 10% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Honor X9c | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP+116% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 5 MP | 12 MP+140% |
| Optical zoom | — | 2 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 16 MP+60% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Honor X9c | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,600 mAh+53% | 4,300 mAh |
| Wired charging | 66 W+164% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 10 h |
Design
| Spec | Honor X9c | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g | 188 g+1% |
| Thickness | 8 mm+42% | 13.7 mm |
| IP rating | IP65 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Honor X9c | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Honor X9c | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (MagicOS 8) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 7 years+133% |
Audio
| Spec | Honor X9c | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Honor X9cvs Huawei P60 ProVSHonor X9cvs Samsung Galaxy S23VSHonor X9cvs Nothing Phone (3a)VSHonor X9cvs Google Pixel 8VSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7vs Infinix Note 60 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7vs Google Pixel 10VSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7vs Google Pixel 8 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6VS