Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) vs Vivo X100 Pro

S
31.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X100 Pro

Vivo

Vivo X100 Pro

$1,099

68.8Inno Score
20Performance66.2
36Display64.3
33.1Camera68.1
38.8Battery79.6
38.7Features65.3
5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)15 spec wins — Vivo X100 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X100 Pro wins this phone face-off, 68.8 to 31.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+46) and battery (+41). Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

  • 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
  • 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
  • 17% lower weight: 184 g vs 221 g
  • Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
  • Lower launch price: $279 vs $1,099

Reasons to pick the Vivo X100 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 66 vs 20
  • Stronger display score: 64 vs 36
  • Stronger camera score: 68 vs 33
  • Stronger battery score: 80 vs 39
  • Stronger features score: 65 vs 39

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus Vivo X100 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)Vivo X100 Pro
Screen size6.4 ″6.78 ″+6%
Panel typeSuper AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution2400x10801260x2800
Pixel density411 ppi452 ppi+10%
Refresh rate90 Hz120 Hz+33%
Peak brightness800 nits3,000 nits+275%
Screen-to-body89.9 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus Vivo X100 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)Vivo X100 Pro
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G80MediaTek Dimensity 9300
AnTuTu 10260,000Top 96%2,200,000+746%Top 8%
Geekbench 6 (single)410Top 97%2,200+437%Top 24%
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,320Top 97%7,600+476%Top 12%
RAM (max)6 GB16 GB+167%
Storage options64GB / 128GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeeMMC 5.1UFS 4.0

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus Vivo X100 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)Vivo X100 Pro
Main camera64 MP+28%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.75
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto50 MP
Optical zoom4.3 x
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera20 MP32 MP+60%
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus Vivo X100 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)Vivo X100 Pro
Capacity5,000 mAh5,400 mAh+8%
Wired charging15 W100 W+567%
Wireless charging50 W
Active use endurance13 h

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus Vivo X100 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)Vivo X100 Pro
Weight184 g+17%221 g
Thickness8.4 mm+6%8.9 mm
IP ratingIP68
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus Vivo X100 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)Vivo X100 Pro
5GNoYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.05.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoNo

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus Vivo X100 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)Vivo X100 Pro
OS at launchAndroid 11 (One UI 3.1)Android 14 (Funtouch OS 14)
OS update pledge4 years+33%3 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus Vivo X100 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)Vivo X100 Pro
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5mm jackYesNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup