Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Samsung Galaxy A52
31.4Performance23.1
45.3Display35.6
41.9Camera48.4
55.7Battery39
70.7Features54.7
10 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A356 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A52
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy A35 wins this phone face-off, 45.1 to 37, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+17) and features (+16). Samsung Galaxy A52 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35
- Stronger performance score: 31 vs 23
- Stronger display score: 45 vs 36
- Stronger battery score: 56 vs 39
- Stronger features score: 71 vs 55
- 88% higher AnTuTu 10: 743,075 vs 395,000
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A52
- Stronger camera score: 48 vs 42
- 146% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 13 MP
- 50% higher Ultra-wide: 12 MP vs 8 MP
- 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
- 10% lower weight: 189 g vs 209 g
- Lower launch price: $349 vs $399
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.6 ″+2% | 6.5 ″ |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 2400x1080 |
| Pixel density | 390 ppi | 405 ppi+4% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz+33% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits+25% | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 84.9 % | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 292,456Top 82% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 87,904Top 91% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 133,634Top 94% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 229,081Top 79% | — |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1380 | Snapdragon 720G |
| AnTuTu 10 | 743,075+88%Top 67% | 395,000Top 85% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,050+44%Top 66% | 730Top 83% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,950+55%Top 64% | 1,900Top 87% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 128GB / 256GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP+28% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 12 MP+50% |
| Optical zoom | 1 x | — |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP+146% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh+11% | 4,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 0 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 12 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 209 g | 189 g+10% |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm+2% | 8.4 mm |
| IP rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | No | No |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) | Android 11 (One UI 3.1) |
| OS update pledge | 4 years | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A35vs Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs Nothing Phone (1)VSSamsung Galaxy A35vs Redmi 15 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs iPhone 14VSSamsung Galaxy A52vs Huawei P30 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A52vs Honor X9aVSSamsung Galaxy A52vs iPhone 11 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy A52vs Redmi Note 10 ProVS