Apple A12 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2100
30.5CPU37.1
30.2GPU34.2
46.6Benchmarks47.5
20AI64
41.8Efficiency55.9
1 spec wins — Apple A12 Bionic9 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2100
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2100 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 44 to 34.3, pulling ahead mainly in AI (+44) and efficiency (+14). Apple A12 Bionic still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A12 Bionic
- 33% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2100
- Stronger CPU score: 37 vs 31
- Stronger GPU score: 34 vs 30
- Stronger AI score: 64 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 56 vs 42
- 420% higher AI performance: 26 TOPS vs 5 TOPS
General
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018 | 2021 |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm+29% |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W+33% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.3 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.49 GHz Vortex + 4x1.52 GHz Tempest | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.49 GHz | 2.9 GHz+16% |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4-core) | Arm Mali-G78 MP14 |
| GPU clock | — | 854 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Neural Engine (8-core) | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 5 TOPS | 26 TOPS+420% |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-2133 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Intel XMM 7560 LTE (external) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | Retina XDR | — |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 720,000Top 46% | 746,547+4%Top 45% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,100Top 42% | 1,430+30%Top 30% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,800Top 49% | 3,550+27%Top 34% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,450Top 66% | 1,500+3%Top 65% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 252,025Top 86% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 127,819Top 72% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 144,909Top 86% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 221,794Top 78% |
Related comparisons
Apple A12 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860VSApple A12 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VSApple A12 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 810VSApple A12 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Samsung Exynos 1480VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Google Tensor G2VS
