Apple A17 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 1480
62.7CPU33.7
47.8GPU28.2
64.2Benchmarks47.4
72AI—
79.6Efficiency73.8
6 spec wins — Apple A17 Pro3 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1480
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A17 Pro wins this mobile chipset face-off, 62.7 to 41.9, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+29) and GPU (+20). Samsung Exynos 1480 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A17 Pro
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 34
- Stronger GPU score: 48 vs 28
- Stronger benchmarks score: 64 vs 47
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 74
- 200% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,600 vs 1,200
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1480
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
- 25% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 8 W
General
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2024 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 6 W+25% |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz | 4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+37% | 2.75 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (6-core) | Samsung Xclipse 530 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X70) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 144Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,450,000+95% | 742,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,950+157% | 1,150 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,250+113% | 3,400 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,600+200% | 1,200 |
Related comparisons
Apple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSApple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300VSApple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Google TensorVSSamsung Exynos 1480vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VS