Apple A17 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 1580
62.7CPU37.3
47.8GPU—
64.2Benchmarks60.1
72AI48.8
79.6Efficiency73.8
7 spec wins — Apple A17 Pro3 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1580
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A17 Pro wins this mobile chipset face-off, 62.7 to 52.2, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+25) and AI (+23). Samsung Exynos 1580 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A17 Pro
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 37
- Stronger benchmarks score: 64 vs 60
- Stronger AI score: 72 vs 49
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 74
- 138% higher AI performance: 35 TOPS vs 15 TOPS
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1580
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
- 25% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 8 W
General
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 1580 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2025 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 6 W+25% |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 1580 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+30% | 2.9 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 1580 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (6-core) | Samsung Xclipse 540 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 1580 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS+138% | 15 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 1580 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5-3200 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s+100% | 25.6 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 1580 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X70) | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 1580 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 144Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 1580 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,450,000+18%Top 20% | 1,227,862Top 26% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,950+119%Top 8% | 1,350Top 34% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,250+86%Top 12% | 3,900Top 31% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,600Top 27% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 466,860Top 43% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 292,734Top 46% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 171,100Top 55% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 297,168Top 49% |
Related comparisons
Apple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300VSApple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 1580vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 1580vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 1580vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSSamsung Exynos 1580vs Google Tensor G4VS
