Apple A17 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2100
62.7CPU37.1
47.8GPU34.2
64.2Benchmarks47.5
72AI64
79.6Efficiency55.9
9 spec wins — Apple A17 Pro1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2100
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A17 Pro wins this mobile chipset face-off, 62.7 to 44, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+26) and efficiency (+24). Samsung Exynos 2100 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A17 Pro
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 37
- Stronger GPU score: 48 vs 34
- Stronger benchmarks score: 64 vs 48
- Stronger AI score: 72 vs 64
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 56
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2100
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2021 |
| Process | 3 nm+40% | 5 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+30% | 2.9 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (6-core) | Arm Mali-G78 MP14 |
| GPU clock | — | 854 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS+35% | 26 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X70) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,450,000+94%Top 20% | 746,547Top 45% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,950+106%Top 8% | 1,430Top 30% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,250+104%Top 12% | 3,550Top 34% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,600+140%Top 27% | 1,500Top 65% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 252,025Top 86% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 127,819Top 72% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 144,909Top 86% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 221,794Top 78% |
Related comparisons
Apple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300VSApple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Samsung Exynos 1480VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Google Tensor G2VS

