Apple A17 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 990
62.7CPU29.8
47.8GPU25.7
64.2Benchmarks37.4
72AI—
79.6Efficiency32.1
9 spec wins — Apple A17 Pro1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 990
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A17 Pro wins this mobile chipset face-off, 62.7 to 30.8, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+47) and CPU (+33). Samsung Exynos 990 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A17 Pro
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 30
- Stronger GPU score: 48 vs 26
- Stronger benchmarks score: 64 vs 37
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 32
- 300% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,600 vs 900
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 990
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2020 |
| Process | 3 nm+57% | 7 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+20% | 10 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz | 2x2.73 GHz Exynos M5 + 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+38% | 2.73 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (6-core) | Arm Mali-G77 MP11 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5-2750 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s+16% | 44 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X70) | Exynos 5123 5G (external) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | WQHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,450,000+190%Top 20% | 500,000Top 60% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,950+228%Top 8% | 900Top 61% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,250+174%Top 12% | 2,650Top 53% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,600+300%Top 27% | 900Top 81% |
Related comparisons
Apple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300VSApple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 990vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695VSSamsung Exynos 990vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GVSSamsung Exynos 990vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSSamsung Exynos 990vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300VS
