Apple A17 Pro vs Unisoc Tiger T760
62.7CPU22.8
47.8GPU—
64.2Benchmarks33.1
72AI—
79.6Efficiency54.9
7 spec wins — Apple A17 Pro2 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T760
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A17 Pro wins this mobile chipset face-off, 62.7 to 33.4, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+40) and benchmarks (+31). Unisoc Tiger T760 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A17 Pro
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 23
- Stronger benchmarks score: 64 vs 33
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 55
- 392% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,950 vs 600
- 282% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 7,250 vs 1,900
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T760
- 37% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 8 W
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2022 |
| Process | 3 nm+50% | 6 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 5 W+37% |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz | 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+72% | 2.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (6-core) | Arm Mali-G57 MP4 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s+199% | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X70) | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,450,000+245%Top 20% | 420,000Top 70% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,950+392%Top 8% | 600Top 76% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,250+282%Top 12% | 1,900Top 72% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,600Top 27% | — |
Related comparisons
Apple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300VSApple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4VSUnisoc Tiger T760vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100+VSUnisoc Tiger T760vs Qualcomm Snapdragon CVSUnisoc Tiger T760vs MediaTek Dimensity 810VSUnisoc Tiger T760vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VS