Apple A17 Pro vs Unisoc Tiger T612
62.7CPU20
47.8GPU—
64.2Benchmarks20
72AI—
79.6Efficiency46.7
7 spec wins — Apple A17 Pro2 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T612
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A17 Pro wins this mobile chipset face-off, 62.7 to 26.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+44) and CPU (+43). Unisoc Tiger T612 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A17 Pro
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 64 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 47
- 602% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,950 vs 420
- 480% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,450,000 vs 250,000
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T612
- 50% lower TDP (typical): 4 W vs 8 W
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2021 |
| Process | 3 nm+75% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 4 W+50% |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz | 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+110% | 1.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (6-core) | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s+244% | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X70) | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 1080p@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,450,000+480%Top 20% | 250,000Top 88% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,950+602%Top 8% | 420Top 84% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,250+383%Top 12% | 1,500Top 83% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,600Top 27% | — |
Related comparisons
Apple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300VSApple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs MediaTek Helio G85VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VS