Google Tensor G3 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
37.1CPU31.2
37.6GPU29.3
41.4Benchmarks39.3
0AI64
69Efficiency55.9
10 spec wins — Google Tensor G30 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2100
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G3 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 43.5 to 39.4, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+13) and GPU (+8). Samsung Exynos 2100 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G3
- Stronger CPU score: 37 vs 31
- Stronger GPU score: 38 vs 29
- Stronger efficiency score: 69 vs 56
- 60% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 2,400 vs 1,500
- 23% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,350 vs 3,550
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2100
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2021 |
| Process | 4 nm+20% | 5 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 9+13% | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X3 + 4x2.37 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.91 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 | Arm Mali-G78 MP14 |
| GPU clock | 890 MHz+4% | 854 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 26 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5300) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 900,000+6% | 850,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,750+22% | 1,430 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,350+23% | 3,550 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,400+60% | 1,500 |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G3vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000VSGoogle Tensor G3vs Apple A14 BionicVSGoogle Tensor G3vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1VSGoogle Tensor G3vs Samsung Exynos 2200VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Samsung Exynos 2200VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Google Tensor G2VS

