Google Tensor G3 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
41.6CPU21.6
41GPU—
52.2Benchmarks20
69Efficiency44.2
7 spec wins — Google Tensor G31 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9611
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G3 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 48.4 to 26.3, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+32) and efficiency (+25). Samsung Exynos 9611 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G3
- Stronger CPU score: 42 vs 22
- Stronger benchmarks score: 52 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 69 vs 44
- 400% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,750 vs 350
- 319% higher AnTuTu 10: 900,000 vs 215,000
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9611
- 37% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 8 W
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2019 |
| Process | 4 nm+60% | 10 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 5 W+37% |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 9+13% | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X3 + 4x2.37 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A510 | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | 2.91 GHz+27% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU clock | 890 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5300) | Integrated LTE Cat-12 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 900,000+319%Top 36% | 215,000Top 93% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,750+400%Top 25% | 350Top 89% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,350+248%Top 26% | 1,250Top 90% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,400Top 47% | — |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G3vs Dimensity 7400 UltraVSGoogle Tensor G3vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000VSGoogle Tensor G3vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSGoogle Tensor G3vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G88VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G85VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VS
