Google Tensor G4 vs MediaTek Helio G200
45.1CPU25.6
43.1GPU—
56.1Benchmarks41.3
71.4Efficiency54.9
5 spec wins — Google Tensor G42 spec wins — MediaTek Helio G200
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G4 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 51.4 to 37.2, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+20) and efficiency (+17). MediaTek Helio G200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G4
- Stronger CPU score: 45 vs 26
- Stronger benchmarks score: 56 vs 41
- Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 55
- 157% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,950 vs 760
- 124% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,700 vs 2,100
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Helio G200
- 29% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 7 W
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | MediaTek Helio G200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm+33% | 6 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | 5 W+29% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | MediaTek Helio G200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520 | 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.1 GHz+29% | 2.4 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | MediaTek Helio G200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 |
| GPU clock | 940 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | MediaTek Helio G200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | MediaTek Helio G200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | MediaTek Helio G200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5400) | Integrated LTE Cat-13 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | MediaTek Helio G200 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 144Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 2K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | MediaTek Helio G200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,050,000+80%Top 29% | 581,818Top 56% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,950+157%Top 21% | 760Top 66% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,700+124%Top 24% | 2,100Top 63% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,600Top 42% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 212,630Top 95% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 47,609Top 92% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 152,829Top 78% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 168,750Top 95% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G4vs Apple A15 BionicVSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSMediaTek Helio G200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865VSMediaTek Helio G200vs MediaTek Dimensity 920VSMediaTek Helio G200vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200VSMediaTek Helio G200vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020VS
