Google Tensor G4 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
45.1CPU29.2
43.1GPU25
56.1Benchmarks47.3
71.4Efficiency63.2
7 spec wins — Google Tensor G41 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1380
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G4 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 51.4 to 37.7, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+18) and CPU (+16). Samsung Exynos 1380 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G4
- Stronger CPU score: 45 vs 29
- Stronger GPU score: 43 vs 25
- Stronger benchmarks score: 56 vs 47
- Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 63
- 222% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 2,600 vs 808
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1380
- 14% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 7 W
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm+20% | 5 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | 6 W+14% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520 | 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.1 GHz+29% | 2.4 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 | Arm Mali-G68 MP5 |
| GPU clock | 940 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5400) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,050,000+42%Top 29% | 740,251Top 45% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,950+93%Top 21% | 1,010Top 50% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,700+70%Top 24% | 2,760Top 50% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,600+222%Top 42% | 808Top 86% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 290,514Top 80% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 89,805Top 83% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 132,447Top 92% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 227,485Top 75% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G4vs Apple A15 BionicVSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 1380vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 1380vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020VSSamsung Exynos 1380vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870VSSamsung Exynos 1380vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080VS

