Google Tensor G4 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
45.1CPU37.1
43.1GPU34.2
56.1Benchmarks47.5
—AI64
71.4Efficiency55.9
9 spec wins — Google Tensor G40 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2100
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G4 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 51.4 to 44, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+16) and GPU (+9). Samsung Exynos 2100 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G4
- Stronger CPU score: 45 vs 37
- Stronger GPU score: 43 vs 34
- Stronger benchmarks score: 56 vs 48
- Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 56
- 73% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 2,600 vs 1,500
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2100
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2021 |
| Process | 4 nm+20% | 5 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.1 GHz+7% | 2.9 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 | Arm Mali-G78 MP14 |
| GPU clock | 940 MHz+10% | 854 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 26 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5400) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,050,000+41%Top 29% | 746,547Top 45% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,950+36%Top 21% | 1,430Top 30% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,700+32%Top 24% | 3,550Top 34% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,600+73%Top 42% | 1,500Top 65% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 252,025Top 86% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 127,819Top 72% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 144,909Top 86% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 221,794Top 78% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G4vs Apple A15 BionicVSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Samsung Exynos 1480VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Google Tensor G2VS

