Google Tensor G4 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
41.4CPU31.2
40GPU29.3
47Benchmarks39.3
0AI64
71.4Efficiency55.9
9 spec wins — Google Tensor G40 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2100
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G4 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 47.3 to 39.4, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+16) and GPU (+11). Samsung Exynos 2100 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G4
- Stronger CPU score: 41 vs 31
- Stronger GPU score: 40 vs 29
- Stronger benchmarks score: 47 vs 39
- Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 56
- 73% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 2,600 vs 1,500
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2100
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2021 |
| Process | 4 nm+20% | 5 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.1 GHz+7% | 2.9 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 | Arm Mali-G78 MP14 |
| GPU clock | 940 MHz+10% | 854 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 26 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5400) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,050,000+24% | 850,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,950+36% | 1,430 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,700+32% | 3,550 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,600+73% | 1,500 |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Apple A15 BionicVSGoogle Tensor G4vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Samsung Exynos 2200VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Google Tensor G2VS

