Google Tensor G4 vs Samsung Exynos 850
45.1CPU20
43.1GPU—
56.1Benchmarks20
71.4Efficiency46.7
6 spec wins — Google Tensor G41 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 850
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G4 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 51.4 to 26.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+36) and CPU (+25). Samsung Exynos 850 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G4
- Stronger CPU score: 45 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 56 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 47
- 1047% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,950 vs 170
- 683% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,700 vs 600
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 850
- 43% lower TDP (typical): 4 W vs 7 W
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2020 |
| Process | 4 nm+50% | 8 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | 4 W+43% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520 | 8x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.1 GHz+55% | 2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 | Arm Mali-G52 MP1 |
| GPU clock | 940 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-1600 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 12.8 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5400) | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 1080p@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,050,000+483%Top 29% | 180,000Top 94% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,950+1047%Top 21% | 170Top 96% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,700+683%Top 24% | 600Top 97% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,600Top 42% | — |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G4vs Apple A15 BionicVSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 850vs MediaTek Helio G85VSSamsung Exynos 850vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSSamsung Exynos 850vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSSamsung Exynos 850vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VS
