Google Tensor vs Qualcomm Snapdragon C
34.9CPU30.7
35.5GPU—
45.2Benchmarks—
58.3Efficiency39.4
3 spec wins — Google Tensor1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon C
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor wins this mobile chipset face-off, 41.2 to 33.6, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+19) and CPU (+4). Qualcomm Snapdragon C still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor
- Stronger CPU score: 35 vs 31
- Stronger efficiency score: 58 vs 39
- 37% lower process: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- 17% higher Max clock: 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon C
- 12% lower TDP (typical): 7 W vs 8 W
General
| Spec | Google Tensor | Qualcomm Snapdragon C |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2019 |
| Process | 5 nm+37% | 8 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 7 W+12% |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | ARMv8-A |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Qualcomm Snapdragon C |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x 2.4 GHz Kryo 468 Gold + 6x 1.8 GHz Kryo 468 Silver |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz+17% | 2.4 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Qualcomm Snapdragon C |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G78 MP20 | Adreno 618 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor | Qualcomm Snapdragon C |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor | Qualcomm Snapdragon C |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4x |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor | Qualcomm Snapdragon C |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5123) | Snapdragon X15 LTE |
| Max download | — | 0.8 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor | Qualcomm Snapdragon C |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | 2560x1440 |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K at 30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor | Qualcomm Snapdragon C |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 680,000Top 49% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,340Top 34% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,150Top 42% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,700Top 60% | — |
Related comparisons
Google Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSGoogle Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs Samsung Exynos 1330VSQualcomm Snapdragon Cvs MediaTek Dimensity 810VSQualcomm Snapdragon Cvs Unisoc Tiger T760VSQualcomm Snapdragon Cvs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VSQualcomm Snapdragon Cvs MediaTek Dimensity 6100+VS

