MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
35.4CPU21.6
31.4GPU—
56.1Benchmarks20
60.7Efficiency44.2
7 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 81001 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9611
InnoReviews verdict
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 43.1 to 26.3, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+36) and efficiency (+17). Samsung Exynos 9611 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8100
- Stronger CPU score: 35 vs 22
- Stronger benchmarks score: 56 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 61 vs 44
- 388% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,050,000 vs 215,000
- 237% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,180 vs 350
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9611
- 29% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 7 W
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2019 |
| Process | 5 nm+50% | 10 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | 5 W+29% |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | 2.85 GHz+24% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC6 | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-3200 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s+72% | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G (sub-6) | Integrated LTE Cat-12 |
| Max download | 4.7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 120Hz / FHD+ @ 168Hz | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,050,000+388%Top 29% | 215,000Top 93% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,180+237%Top 37% | 350Top 89% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,800+204%Top 32% | 1,250Top 90% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,600Top 62% | — |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8100vs Google Tensor G2VSMediaTek Dimensity 8100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSMediaTek Dimensity 8100vs Samsung Exynos 1480VSMediaTek Dimensity 8100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G88VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G85VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VS