MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
35.4CPU20
31.4GPU—
56.1Benchmarks20
60.7Efficiency46.7
7 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 81001 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T612
InnoReviews verdict
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 43.1 to 26.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+36) and CPU (+15). Unisoc Tiger T612 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8100
- Stronger CPU score: 35 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 56 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 61 vs 47
- 320% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,050,000 vs 250,000
- 181% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,180 vs 420
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T612
- 43% lower TDP (typical): 4 W vs 7 W
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2021 |
| Process | 5 nm+58% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | 4 W+43% |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.85 GHz+58% | 1.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC6 | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-3200 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s+72% | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G (sub-6) | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Max download | 4.7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 120Hz / FHD+ @ 168Hz | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 1080p@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,050,000+320%Top 29% | 250,000Top 88% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,180+181%Top 37% | 420Top 84% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,800+153%Top 32% | 1,500Top 83% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,600Top 62% | — |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8100vs Google Tensor G2VSMediaTek Dimensity 8100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSMediaTek Dimensity 8100vs Samsung Exynos 1480VSMediaTek Dimensity 8100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs MediaTek Helio G85VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VS