MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
45.9CPU21.6
46.1GPU—
71.7Benchmarks20
73.8Efficiency44.2
7 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 84001 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9611
InnoReviews verdict
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 56.3 to 26.3, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+52) and efficiency (+30). Samsung Exynos 9611 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8400
- Stronger CPU score: 46 vs 22
- Stronger benchmarks score: 72 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 74 vs 44
- 805% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,946,644 vs 215,000
- 412% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,400 vs 1,250
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9611
- 17% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 6 W
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2019 |
| Process | 4 nm+60% | 10 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | 5 W+17% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725 | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | 3.25 GHz+41% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G720 MC7 | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 880 | — |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-8533 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s+358% | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated LTE Cat-12 |
| Max download | 5.2 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,946,644+805%Top 12% | 215,000Top 93% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,450+314%Top 28% | 350Top 89% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,400+412%Top 16% | 1,250Top 90% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,400Top 32% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 560,176Top 32% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 642,040Top 23% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 339,619Top 23% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 404,809Top 32% | — |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Apple A16 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G88VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G85VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VS