Skip to content
InnoReviews

MediaTek Helio G200 vs Samsung Exynos 1610

MediaTek Helio G200
37.2Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
25.6CPU30.7
41.3Benchmarks—
54.9Efficiencyspec-based—
0 spec wins — MediaTek Helio G2001 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the MediaTek Helio G200

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • Stronger CPU score: 31 vs 26

General

General comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Helio G200Samsung Exynos 1610
Announced20252026
Process6 nm—
TDP (typical)5 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2—

CPU

CPU comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Helio G200Samsung Exynos 1610
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552 + 6
Max clock2.4 GHz2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Helio G200Samsung Exynos 1610
GPUArm Mali-G57 MC2Mali-G68

Memory

Memory comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Helio G200Samsung Exynos 1610
Memory typeLPDDR4X-2133—
Max bandwidth17.1 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Helio G200Samsung Exynos 1610
ModemIntegrated LTE Cat-13—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.45.3

Media

Media comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Helio G200Samsung Exynos 1610
Max displayFHD+ @ 144Hz—
Video capture2K@30fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Helio G200Samsung Exynos 1610
AnTuTu581,818Top 92%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)212,630Top 95%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)47,609Top 92%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)152,829Top 78%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)168,750Top 95%—
Geekbench 6 (single)760Top 68%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,100Top 65%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup