Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
29.2CPU20
25GPU—
47.3Benchmarks20
63.2Efficiency46.7
6 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 13801 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T612
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 1380 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 37.7 to 26.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+27) and efficiency (+17). Unisoc Tiger T612 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1380
- Stronger CPU score: 29 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 47 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 63 vs 47
- 196% higher AnTuTu 10: 740,251 vs 250,000
- 140% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,010 vs 420
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T612
- 33% lower TDP (typical): 4 W vs 6 W
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1380 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2021 |
| Process | 5 nm+58% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | 4 W+33% |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1380 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz+33% | 1.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1380 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G68 MP5 | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1380 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1380 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1380 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1380 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 120Hz | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1380 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 740,251+196%Top 45% | 250,000Top 88% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,010+140%Top 50% | 420Top 84% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,760+84%Top 50% | 1,500Top 83% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 808Top 86% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 290,514Top 80% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 89,805Top 83% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 132,447Top 92% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 227,485Top 75% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 1380vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 1380vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020VSSamsung Exynos 1380vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870VSSamsung Exynos 1380vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs MediaTek Helio G85VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VS