Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
37.1CPU20
34.2GPU—
47.5Benchmarks20
64AI—
55.9Efficiency46.7
5 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 21001 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T612
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2100 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 44 to 26.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+28) and CPU (+17). Unisoc Tiger T612 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2100
- Stronger CPU score: 37 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 48 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 56 vs 47
- 240% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,430 vs 420
- 199% higher AnTuTu 10: 746,547 vs 250,000
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T612
- 56% lower TDP (typical): 4 W vs 9 W
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2100 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2021 |
| Process | 5 nm+58% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 4 W+56% |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2100 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.9 GHz+61% | 1.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2100 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G78 MP14 | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU clock | 854 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2100 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
| AI performance | 26 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2100 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2100 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2100 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2100 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 746,547+199%Top 45% | 250,000Top 88% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,430+240%Top 30% | 420Top 84% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,550+137%Top 34% | 1,500Top 83% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,500Top 65% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 252,025Top 86% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 127,819Top 72% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 144,909Top 86% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 221,794Top 78% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Samsung Exynos 1480VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Google Tensor G2VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs MediaTek Helio G85VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VS