Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Unisoc Tiger T760
21.6CPU22.8
20Benchmarks33.1
44.2Efficiency54.9
1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 96116 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T760
InnoReviews verdict
Unisoc Tiger T760 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 33.4 to 26.3, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+13) and efficiency (+11). Samsung Exynos 9611 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9611
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T760
- Stronger benchmarks score: 33 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 55 vs 44
- 95% higher AnTuTu 10: 420,000 vs 215,000
- 71% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 600 vs 350
- 52% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 1,900 vs 1,250
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9611 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019 | 2022 |
| Process | 10 nm | 6 nm+40% |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W | 5 W |
| Architecture | Armv8 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9611 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 | 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.3 GHz+5% | 2.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9611 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 | Arm Mali-G57 MP4 |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9611 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-1866 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | 14.9 GB/s | 17.1 GB/s+15% |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9611 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated LTE Cat-12 | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9611 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 60Hz | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9611 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 215,000Top 93% | 420,000+95%Top 70% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 350Top 89% | 600+71%Top 76% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 1,250Top 90% | 1,900+52%Top 72% |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G88VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G85VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSUnisoc Tiger T760vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100+VSUnisoc Tiger T760vs Qualcomm Snapdragon CVSUnisoc Tiger T760vs MediaTek Dimensity 810VSUnisoc Tiger T760vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VS