Samsung Exynos 990 vs Unisoc Tiger T760
29.8CPU22.8
25.7GPU—
37.4Benchmarks33.1
32.1Efficiency54.9
5 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9903 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T760
InnoReviews verdict
Unisoc Tiger T760 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 33.4 to 30.8, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+23). Samsung Exynos 990 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 990
- Stronger CPU score: 30 vs 23
- Stronger benchmarks score: 37 vs 33
- 157% higher Max bandwidth: 44 GB/s vs 17.1 GB/s
- 50% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 900 vs 600
- 39% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 2,650 vs 1,900
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T760
- Stronger efficiency score: 55 vs 32
- 50% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 10 W
- 14% lower process: 6 nm vs 7 nm
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 990 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2022 |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm+14% |
| TDP (typical) | 10 W | 5 W+50% |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 990 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.73 GHz Exynos M5 + 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.73 GHz+24% | 2.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 990 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G77 MP11 | Arm Mali-G57 MP4 |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 990 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-2750 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | 44 GB/s+157% | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 990 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Exynos 5123 5G (external) | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 990 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 120Hz | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 990 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 500,000+19%Top 60% | 420,000Top 70% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 900+50%Top 61% | 600Top 76% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,650+39%Top 53% | 1,900Top 72% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 900Top 81% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 990vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695VSSamsung Exynos 990vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GVSSamsung Exynos 990vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSSamsung Exynos 990vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300VSUnisoc Tiger T760vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100+VSUnisoc Tiger T760vs Qualcomm Snapdragon CVSUnisoc Tiger T760vs MediaTek Dimensity 810VSUnisoc Tiger T760vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VS