Samsung Exynos 990 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
29.8CPU20
25.7GPU—
37.4Benchmarks20
32.1Efficiency46.7
6 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9902 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T612
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 990 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 30.8 to 26.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+17) and CPU (+10). Unisoc Tiger T612 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 990
- Stronger CPU score: 30 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 37 vs 20
- 195% higher Max bandwidth: 44 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
- 114% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 900 vs 420
- 100% higher AnTuTu 10: 500,000 vs 250,000
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T612
- Stronger efficiency score: 47 vs 32
- 60% lower TDP (typical): 4 W vs 10 W
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 990 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2021 |
| Process | 7 nm+42% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 10 W | 4 W+60% |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 990 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.73 GHz Exynos M5 + 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.73 GHz+52% | 1.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 990 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G77 MP11 | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 990 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-2750 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | 44 GB/s+195% | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 990 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Exynos 5123 5G (external) | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 990 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 120Hz | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 990 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 500,000+100%Top 60% | 250,000Top 88% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 900+114%Top 61% | 420Top 84% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,650+77%Top 53% | 1,500Top 83% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 900Top 81% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 990vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695VSSamsung Exynos 990vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GVSSamsung Exynos 990vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSSamsung Exynos 990vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs MediaTek Helio G85VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VS