AGM PAD P3 Compact vs Teclast ArtPad
33.3Performance33.3
77.1Display20
—Battery20
20Features61.2
1 spec wins — AGM PAD P3 Compact1 spec wins — Teclast ArtPad
InnoReviews verdict
AGM PAD P3 Compact wins this tablet face-off, 46.1 to 31.3, pulling ahead mainly in display (+57). Teclast ArtPad still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the AGM PAD P3 Compact
- Stronger display score: 77 vs 20
- 100% higher Refresh rate: 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
Reasons to pick the Teclast ArtPad
- Stronger features score: 61 vs 20
- 26% higher Screen size: 11 ″ vs 8.7 ″
Display
| Spec | AGM PAD P3 Compact | Teclast ArtPad |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 8.7 ″ | 11 ″+26% |
| Panel type | — | IPS LCD |
| Resolution | — | 1920x1200 |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz+100% | 60 Hz |
Performance
| Spec | AGM PAD P3 Compact | Teclast ArtPad |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | Unisoc T606 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage options | 128GB | 128GB |
Battery
| Spec | AGM PAD P3 Compact | Teclast ArtPad |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | — | 7,000 mAh |
| Charging | — | 10 W |
Camera
| Spec | AGM PAD P3 Compact | Teclast ArtPad |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | — | 13 MP |
| Front camera | — | 5 MP |
Connectivity
| Spec | AGM PAD P3 Compact | Teclast ArtPad |
|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
| Cellular | 4G LTE, eSIM | — |
| USB | — | USB-C |
Features
| Spec | AGM PAD P3 Compact | Teclast ArtPad |
|---|---|---|
| Stylus | — | Active stylus |
| Keyboard support | — | Yes |
| Speakers | — | Stereo quad speakers |
| Operating system | — | Android 14 |