Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple M1 (8-core) vs Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

Apple M1 (8-core)
47.3Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
66.5Inno Score
53.6Single-core70.3
35.8Multi-core60
80Efficiencyspec-based81.4
—iGPU70
31.1Platformspec-based58.2
0 spec wins — Apple M1 (8-core)12 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

InnoReviews verdict

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H wins this laptop processor face-off, 66.5 to 47.3, pulling ahead mainly in multi-core (+24) and single-core (+17). Apple M1 (8-core) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple M1 (8-core)

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

  • Stronger single-core score: 70 vs 54
  • Stronger multi-core score: 60 vs 36
  • 700% higher Max memory: 128 GB vs 16 GB
  • 200% higher Efficiency cores: 12 vs 4
  • 155% higher PassMark: 36,060 vs 14,122

General

General comparison: Apple M1 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecApple M1 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Announced20202026
Process5 nm2 nm+60%
Base TDP—25 W
Max TDP—80 W

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Apple M1 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecApple M1 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Cores816+100%
Performance cores44
Efficiency cores412+200%
Threads816+100%
Base clock—2.1 GHz
Boost clock3.2 GHz4.9 GHz+53%
L3 cache—18 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Apple M1 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecApple M1 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
iGPUApple 8-core GPUIntel Graphics (4 Xe3-cores)
iGPU clock—2,500 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple M1 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecApple M1 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Memory supportLPDDR4X-4266LPDDR5X, DDR5
Max memory16 GB128 GB+700%

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple M1 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecApple M1 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Geekbench 6 (single)2,340Bottom 34%2,876+23%Top 21%
Geekbench 6 (multi)8,350Bottom 29%16,298+95%Top 18%
Cinebench R23 (single)1,500Bottom 28%2,069+38%Top 14%
Cinebench R23 (multi)7,760Bottom 23%19,307+149%Top 18%
PassMark14,122Bottom 27%36,060+155%Top 16%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)—2,846Top 21%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup