Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple M1 Pro (10-core) vs Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

Apple M1 Pro (10-core)
53.2Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
66.5Inno Score
54.6Single-core70.3
46.3Multi-core60
80Efficiencyspec-based81.4
—iGPU70
40Platformspec-based58.2
1 spec wins — Apple M1 Pro (10-core)12 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

InnoReviews verdict

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H wins this laptop processor face-off, 66.5 to 53.2, pulling ahead mainly in single-core (+16) and multi-core (+14). Apple M1 Pro (10-core) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple M1 Pro (10-core)

  • 100% higher Performance cores: 8 vs 4

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

  • Stronger single-core score: 70 vs 55
  • Stronger multi-core score: 60 vs 46
  • 500% higher Efficiency cores: 12 vs 2
  • 300% higher Max memory: 128 GB vs 32 GB
  • 64% higher PassMark: 36,060 vs 21,932

General

General comparison: Apple M1 Pro (10-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecApple M1 Pro (10-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Announced20212026
Process5 nm2 nm+60%
Base TDP—25 W
Max TDP—80 W

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Apple M1 Pro (10-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecApple M1 Pro (10-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Cores1016+60%
Performance cores8+100%4
Efficiency cores212+500%
Threads1016+60%
Base clock—2.1 GHz
Boost clock3.2 GHz4.9 GHz+52%
L3 cache—18 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Apple M1 Pro (10-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecApple M1 Pro (10-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
iGPUApple 16-core GPUIntel Graphics (4 Xe3-cores)
iGPU clock—2,500 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple M1 Pro (10-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecApple M1 Pro (10-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Memory supportLPDDR5-6400LPDDR5X, DDR5
Max memory32 GB128 GB+300%

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple M1 Pro (10-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecApple M1 Pro (10-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Geekbench 6 (single)2,380Bottom 35%2,876+21%Top 21%
Geekbench 6 (multi)12,400Top 42%16,298+31%Top 18%
Cinebench R23 (single)1,530Bottom 31%2,069+35%Top 14%
Cinebench R23 (multi)12,350Bottom 50%19,307+56%Top 18%
PassMark21,932Top 48%36,060+64%Top 16%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)—2,846Top 21%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup