Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple M2 (8-core) vs Intel Celeron N4020

WINNER
Apple M2 (8-core)
50.4Inno Score
VS
Intel Celeron N4020
28Inno Score
58.1Single-core20
38.7Multi-core20
80Efficiencyspec-based73.3
—iGPU20
35Platformspec-based20
11 spec wins — Apple M2 (8-core)0 spec wins — Intel Celeron N4020

InnoReviews verdict

Apple M2 (8-core) wins this laptop processor face-off, 50.4 to 28, pulling ahead mainly in single-core (+38) and multi-core (+19). Intel Celeron N4020 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple M2 (8-core)

  • Stronger single-core score: 58 vs 20
  • Stronger multi-core score: 39 vs 20
  • 1312% higher Cinebench R23 (multi): 8,700 vs 616
  • 922% higher PassMark: 15,648 vs 1,531
  • 413% higher Cinebench R23 (single): 1,580 vs 308

Reasons to pick the Intel Celeron N4020

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Celeron N4020
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Celeron N4020
Announced20222019
Process5 nm+64%14 nm
Base TDP—6 W
Max TDP—15 W

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Celeron N4020
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Celeron N4020
Cores8+300%2
Performance cores40
Efficiency cores4+100%2
Threads8+300%2
Base clock—1.1 GHz
Boost clock3.5 GHz+25%2.8 GHz
L3 cache—4 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Celeron N4020
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Celeron N4020
iGPUApple 10-core GPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (12 EU)
iGPU clock—650 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Celeron N4020
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Celeron N4020
Memory supportLPDDR5-6400DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400
Max memory24 GB+200%8 GB

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Celeron N4020
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Celeron N4020
Geekbench 6 (single)2,600Top 44%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)9,750Bottom 38%—
Cinebench R23 (single)1,580+413%Bottom 39%308Bottom 2%
Cinebench R23 (multi)8,700+1312%Bottom 30%616Bottom 2%
PassMark15,648+922%Bottom 32%1,531Bottom 1%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)—108Bottom 2%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup