Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple M2 (8-core) vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

Apple M2 (8-core)
39.1Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
64.3Inno Score
44Single-core71.8
24.7Multi-core58.6
77.1Efficiency58.3
0iGPU78
26.5Platform61.8
0 spec wins — Apple M2 (8-core)12 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

InnoReviews verdict

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H wins this laptop processor face-off, 64.3 to 39.1, pulling ahead mainly in iGPU (+78) and platform (+35). Apple M2 (8-core) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple M2 (8-core)

  • Stronger efficiency score: 77 vs 58

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

  • Stronger Single-core score: 72 vs 44
  • Stronger Multi-core score: 59 vs 25
  • Stronger platform score: 62 vs 27
  • 433% higher Max memory: 128 GB vs 24 GB
  • 178% higher Cinebench R23 (multi): 24,200 vs 8,700

General

General comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Announced20222025
Process5 nm3 nm+40%
Base TDP45 W
Max TDP115 W

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Cores816+100%
Performance cores46+50%
Efficiency cores410+150%
Threads816+100%
Base clock2.9 GHz
Boost clock3.5 GHz5.4 GHz+55%
L3 cache24 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
iGPUApple 10-core GPUIntel Arc 140T
iGPU clock2,350 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Memory supportLPDDR5-6400LPDDR5X-8400 / DDR5-6400
Max memory24 GB128 GB+433%

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Geekbench 6 (single)2,6003,080+18%
Geekbench 6 (multi)9,75017,900+84%
Cinebench R23 (single)1,5802,180+38%
Cinebench R23 (multi)8,70024,200+178%
PassMark36,800

Related comparisons

Try another matchup