Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple M2 (8-core) vs Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

Apple M2 (8-core)
50.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
66.5Inno Score
58.1Single-core70.3
38.7Multi-core60
80Efficiencyspec-based81.4
—iGPU70
35Platformspec-based58.2
0 spec wins — Apple M2 (8-core)12 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

InnoReviews verdict

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H wins this laptop processor face-off, 66.5 to 50.4, pulling ahead mainly in multi-core (+21) and single-core (+12). Apple M2 (8-core) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple M2 (8-core)

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

  • Stronger single-core score: 70 vs 58
  • Stronger multi-core score: 60 vs 39
  • 433% higher Max memory: 128 GB vs 24 GB
  • 200% higher Efficiency cores: 12 vs 4
  • 130% higher PassMark: 36,060 vs 15,648

General

General comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Announced20222026
Process5 nm2 nm+60%
Base TDP—25 W
Max TDP—80 W

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Cores816+100%
Performance cores44
Efficiency cores412+200%
Threads816+100%
Base clock—2.1 GHz
Boost clock3.5 GHz4.9 GHz+40%
L3 cache—18 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
iGPUApple 10-core GPUIntel Graphics (4 Xe3-cores)
iGPU clock—2,500 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Memory supportLPDDR5-6400LPDDR5X, DDR5
Max memory24 GB128 GB+433%

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Geekbench 6 (single)2,600Top 44%2,876+11%Top 21%
Geekbench 6 (multi)9,750Bottom 38%16,298+67%Top 18%
Cinebench R23 (single)1,580Bottom 34%2,069+31%Top 14%
Cinebench R23 (multi)8,700Bottom 29%19,307+122%Top 18%
PassMark15,648Bottom 33%36,060+130%Top 16%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)—2,846Top 21%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup