Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple M5 Pro (18-core) vs Intel Celeron N4020

WINNER
Apple M5 Pro (18-core)
87.4Inno Score
VS
Intel Celeron N4020
28Inno Score
91.5Single-core20
94.8Multi-core20
93.3Efficiencyspec-based73.3
—iGPU20
57.5Platformspec-based20
10 spec wins — Apple M5 Pro (18-core)1 spec wins — Intel Celeron N4020

InnoReviews verdict

Apple M5 Pro (18-core) wins this laptop processor face-off, 87.4 to 28, pulling ahead mainly in multi-core (+75) and single-core (+72). Intel Celeron N4020 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple M5 Pro (18-core)

  • Stronger single-core score: 92 vs 20
  • Stronger multi-core score: 95 vs 20
  • 3633% higher PassMark: 57,150 vs 1,531
  • 800% higher cores: 18 vs 2
  • 800% higher threads: 18 vs 2

Reasons to pick the Intel Celeron N4020

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Apple M5 Pro (18-core) versus Intel Celeron N4020
SpecApple M5 Pro (18-core)Intel Celeron N4020
Announced20262019
Process3 nm+79%14 nm
Base TDP—6 W
Max TDP—15 W

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Apple M5 Pro (18-core) versus Intel Celeron N4020
SpecApple M5 Pro (18-core)Intel Celeron N4020
Cores18+800%2
Performance cores180
Efficiency cores02
Threads18+800%2
Base clock4.4 GHz+300%1.1 GHz
Boost clock4.6 GHz+64%2.8 GHz
L3 cache24 MB+500%4 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Apple M5 Pro (18-core) versus Intel Celeron N4020
SpecApple M5 Pro (18-core)Intel Celeron N4020
iGPUApple 20-core GPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (12 EU)
iGPU clock—650 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple M5 Pro (18-core) versus Intel Celeron N4020
SpecApple M5 Pro (18-core)Intel Celeron N4020
Memory supportLPDDR5X-9600DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400
Max memory64 GB+700%8 GB

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple M5 Pro (18-core) versus Intel Celeron N4020
SpecApple M5 Pro (18-core)Intel Celeron N4020
Geekbench 6 (single)4,295Top 4%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)28,436Top 3%—
Cinebench R23 (single)—308Bottom 2%
Cinebench R23 (multi)—616Bottom 2%
PassMark57,150+3633%Top 3%1,531Bottom 1%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)—108Bottom 2%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup