Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple M5 Pro (18-core) vs Intel Core 5 315

WINNER
Apple M5 Pro (18-core)
87.4Inno Score
VS
Intel Core 5 315
50.7Inno Score
91.5Single-core54
94.8Multi-core35.7
93.3Efficiencyspec-based93
57.5Platformspec-based37.9
9 spec wins — Apple M5 Pro (18-core)2 spec wins — Intel Core 5 315

InnoReviews verdict

Apple M5 Pro (18-core) wins this laptop processor face-off, 87.4 to 50.7, pulling ahead mainly in multi-core (+59) and single-core (+38). Intel Core 5 315 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple M5 Pro (18-core)

  • Stronger single-core score: 92 vs 54
  • Stronger multi-core score: 95 vs 36
  • 800% higher Performance cores: 18 vs 2
  • 300% higher L3 cache: 24 MB vs 6 MB
  • 290% higher PassMark: 57,150 vs 14,672

Reasons to pick the Intel Core 5 315

  • 33% lower process: 2 nm vs 3 nm

General

General comparison: Apple M5 Pro (18-core) versus Intel Core 5 315
SpecApple M5 Pro (18-core)Intel Core 5 315
Announced20262026
Process3 nm2 nm+33%
Base TDP—15 W
Max TDP—35 W

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Apple M5 Pro (18-core) versus Intel Core 5 315
SpecApple M5 Pro (18-core)Intel Core 5 315
Cores18+200%6
Performance cores18+800%2
Efficiency cores04
Threads18+200%6
Base clock4.4 GHz+193%1.5 GHz
Boost clock4.6 GHz+5%4.4 GHz
L3 cache24 MB+300%6 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Apple M5 Pro (18-core) versus Intel Core 5 315
SpecApple M5 Pro (18-core)Intel Core 5 315
iGPUApple 20-core GPUIntel Graphics (2 Xe3-cores)
iGPU clock—2,300 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple M5 Pro (18-core) versus Intel Core 5 315
SpecApple M5 Pro (18-core)Intel Core 5 315
Memory supportLPDDR5X-9600LPDDR5X-7467 / DDR5-6400
Max memory64 GB64 GB

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple M5 Pro (18-core) versus Intel Core 5 315
SpecApple M5 Pro (18-core)Intel Core 5 315
Geekbench 6 (single)4,295+71%Top 3%2,516Bottom 51%
Geekbench 6 (multi)28,436+281%Top 2%7,454Bottom 23%
PassMark57,150+290%Top 3%14,672Bottom 29%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup