Skip to content
InnoReviews

Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon C

VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon C
—Inno Score
79Single-core—
86.8Multi-core—
44.4Efficiencyspec-based73.3
60.5iGPU—
73.9Platformspec-based28.9
4 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus0 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon C

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Qualcomm Snapdragon C lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus

  • 200% higher cores: 24 vs 8
  • 200% higher threads: 24 vs 8
  • 83% higher Boost clock: 5.5 GHz vs 3 GHz
  • 50% lower process: 3 nm vs 6 nm

Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon C

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 290HX PlusQualcomm Snapdragon C
Announced20262026
Process3 nm+50%6 nm
Base TDP55 W—
Max TDP160 W—

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 290HX PlusQualcomm Snapdragon C
Cores24+200%8
Performance cores8—
Efficiency cores16—
Threads24+200%8
Base clock2.7 GHz—
Boost clock5.5 GHz+83%3 GHz
L3 cache36 MB—

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 290HX PlusQualcomm Snapdragon C
iGPUIntel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)Qualcomm Adreno A643
iGPU clock2,000 MHz900 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 290HX PlusQualcomm Snapdragon C
Memory supportDDR5-6400—
Max memory256 GB—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 290HX PlusQualcomm Snapdragon C
Geekbench 6 (single)3,198Top 9%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)21,581Top 7%—
Cinebench R23 (single)2,340Top 2%—
Cinebench R23 (multi)39,617Top 1%—
PassMark58,672Top 1%—
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)1,855Top 37%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup