Intel Core 5 320 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
64.1Single-core74.7
34.6Multi-core64.7
93Efficiencyspec-based56
53.3iGPU75.9
37.9Platformspec-based60.5
3 spec wins — Intel Core 5 32015 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
InnoReviews verdict
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H wins this laptop processor face-off, 66.4 to 53.1, pulling ahead mainly in multi-core (+30) and iGPU (+23). Intel Core 5 320 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Intel Core 5 320
- 67% lower Base TDP: 15 W vs 45 W
- 33% lower process: 2 nm vs 3 nm
Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
- Stronger single-core score: 75 vs 64
- Stronger multi-core score: 65 vs 35
- Stronger iGPU score: 76 vs 53
- 300% higher L3 cache: 24 MB vs 6 MB
- 291% higher Cinebench R23 (multi): 24,200 vs 6,197
General
| Spec | Intel Core 5 320 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2025 |
| Process | 2 nm+33% | 3 nm |
| Base TDP | 15 W+67% | 45 W |
| Max TDP | 35 W | 115 W+229% |
Cores & Clocks
| Spec | Intel Core 5 320 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 16+167% |
| Performance cores | 2 | 6+200% |
| Efficiency cores | 4 | 10+150% |
| Threads | 6 | 16+167% |
| Base clock | 1.5 GHz | 2.9 GHz+93% |
| Boost clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.4 GHz+17% |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 24 MB+300% |
Integrated GPU
| Spec | Intel Core 5 320 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| iGPU | Intel Graphics (2 Xe3-cores) | Intel Arc 140T |
| iGPU clock | 2,500 MHz | 2,350 MHz |
Memory
| Spec | Intel Core 5 320 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| Memory support | LPDDR5X-7467 / DDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X-8400 / DDR5-6400 |
| Max memory | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Intel Core 5 320 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,575Top 46% | 3,080+20%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,888Bottom 25% | 17,900+127%Top 13% |
| Cinebench R23 (single) | 1,926Top 28% | 2,180+13%Top 9% |
| Cinebench R23 (multi) | 6,197Bottom 17% | 24,200+291%Top 12% |
| PassMark | 15,463Bottom 33% | 34,203+121%Top 18% |
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU) | 1,343Bottom 48% | 3,719+177%Top 7% |
Related comparisons
Intel Core 5 320vs Apple M1 Pro (10-core)VSIntel Core 5 320vs Intel Core i9-12900HKVSIntel Core 5 320vs Intel Core i7-12700HVSIntel Core 5 320vs Intel Core i7-1355UVSIntel Core Ultra 9 285Hvs Intel Core Ultra 9 386HVSIntel Core Ultra 9 285Hvs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370VSIntel Core Ultra 9 285Hvs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-80-100VSIntel Core Ultra 9 285Hvs Intel Core Ultra 7 255HVS