Skip to content
InnoReviews

Intel Core Ultra 5 226V vs Qualcomm Snapdragon C

Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
53.7Inno Score
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon C
—Inno Score
57.6Single-core—
39.3Multi-core—
88.5Efficiencyspec-based73.3
73.7iGPU—
32.7Platformspec-based28.9
2 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 5 226V1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon C

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Qualcomm Snapdragon C lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V

  • 50% lower process: 3 nm vs 6 nm
  • 50% higher Boost clock: 4.5 GHz vs 3 GHz

Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon C

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 5 226VQualcomm Snapdragon C
Announced20242026
Process3 nm+50%6 nm
Base TDP17 W—
Max TDP37 W—

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 5 226VQualcomm Snapdragon C
Cores88
Performance cores4—
Efficiency cores4—
Threads88
Base clock2.1 GHz—
Boost clock4.5 GHz+50%3 GHz
L3 cache8 MB—

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 5 226VQualcomm Snapdragon C
iGPUIntel Arc 130VQualcomm Adreno A643
iGPU clock1,850 MHz900 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 5 226VQualcomm Snapdragon C
Memory supportLPDDR5X-8533 (on-package)—
Max memory16 GB—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 5 226VQualcomm Snapdragon C
Geekbench 6 (single)2,450Bottom 48%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)9,700Bottom 37%—
Cinebench R23 (single)1,650Bottom 45%—
Cinebench R23 (multi)8,700Bottom 30%—
PassMark17,934Bottom 43%—
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)3,371Top 10%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup