Skip to content
InnoReviews

Intel Core Ultra 5 325 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon C

Intel Core Ultra 5 325
57.4Inno Score
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon C
—Inno Score
63.3Single-core—
42.7Multi-core—
81.4Efficiencyspec-based73.3
70.1iGPU—
49.2Platformspec-based28.9
2 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 5 3250 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon C

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Qualcomm Snapdragon C lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 5 325

  • 67% lower process: 2 nm vs 6 nm
  • 50% higher Boost clock: 4.5 GHz vs 3 GHz

Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon C

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Intel Core Ultra 5 325 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 5 325Qualcomm Snapdragon C
Announced20262026
Process2 nm+67%6 nm
Base TDP25 W—
Max TDP55 W—

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Intel Core Ultra 5 325 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 5 325Qualcomm Snapdragon C
Cores88
Performance cores4—
Efficiency cores4—
Threads88
Base clock2.1 GHz—
Boost clock4.5 GHz+50%3 GHz
L3 cache12 MB—

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Intel Core Ultra 5 325 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 5 325Qualcomm Snapdragon C
iGPUIntel Graphics (4 Xe3-cores)Qualcomm Adreno A643
iGPU clock2,450 MHz900 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Intel Core Ultra 5 325 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 5 325Qualcomm Snapdragon C
Memory supportLPDDR5X-7467 / DDR5-6400—
Max memory128 GB—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Intel Core Ultra 5 325 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 5 325Qualcomm Snapdragon C
Geekbench 6 (single)2,590Top 44%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)10,928Bottom 47%—
Cinebench R23 (single)1,874Top 32%—
Cinebench R23 (multi)10,868Bottom 44%—
PassMark19,278Bottom 48%—
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)2,866Top 19%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup