Skip to content
InnoReviews

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Processor N250

WINNER
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
66.4Inno Score
VS
Intel Processor N250
34.4Inno Score
74.7Single-core26.8
64.7Multi-core22.3
56Efficiencyspec-based82.2
75.9iGPU34.1
60.5Platformspec-based27.6
12 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 285H1 spec wins — Intel Processor N250

InnoReviews verdict

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H wins this laptop processor face-off, 66.4 to 34.4, pulling ahead mainly in single-core (+48) and multi-core (+42). Intel Processor N250 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

  • Stronger single-core score: 75 vs 27
  • Stronger multi-core score: 65 vs 22
  • Stronger iGPU score: 76 vs 34
  • 700% higher Max memory: 128 GB vs 16 GB
  • 632% higher PassMark: 34,203 vs 4,670

Reasons to pick the Intel Processor N250

  • 87% lower Base TDP: 6 W vs 45 W

General

General comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H versus Intel Processor N250
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 285HIntel Processor N250
Announced20252025
Process3 nm+70%10 nm
Base TDP45 W6 W+87%
Max TDP115 W—

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H versus Intel Processor N250
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 285HIntel Processor N250
Cores16+300%4
Performance cores60
Efficiency cores10+150%4
Threads16+300%4
Base clock2.9 GHz—
Boost clock5.4 GHz+42%3.8 GHz
L3 cache24 MB+300%6 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H versus Intel Processor N250
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 285HIntel Processor N250
iGPUIntel Arc 140TIntel Graphics (32 EU)
iGPU clock2,350 MHz1,250 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H versus Intel Processor N250
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 285HIntel Processor N250
Memory supportLPDDR5X-8400 / DDR5-6400DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Max memory128 GB+700%16 GB

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H versus Intel Processor N250
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 285HIntel Processor N250
Geekbench 6 (single)3,080+152%Top 14%1,224Bottom 3%
Geekbench 6 (multi)17,900+542%Top 12%2,786Bottom 1%
Cinebench R23 (single)2,180Top 8%—
Cinebench R23 (multi)24,200Top 12%—
PassMark34,203+632%Top 18%4,670Bottom 5%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)3,719+556%Top 7%567Bottom 20%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup