Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
74.7Single-core51.7
64.7Multi-core44.4
56Efficiencyspec-based88.6
75.9iGPU44.8
60.5Platformspec-based29.1
11 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 285H3 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
InnoReviews verdict
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H wins this laptop processor face-off, 66.4 to 50.6, pulling ahead mainly in iGPU (+31) and single-core (+23). Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
- Stronger single-core score: 75 vs 52
- Stronger multi-core score: 65 vs 44
- Stronger iGPU score: 76 vs 45
- 305% higher 3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU): 3,719 vs 918
- 300% higher L3 cache: 24 MB vs 6 MB
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
- 67% lower Base TDP: 15 W vs 45 W
- 33% higher Performance cores: 8 vs 6
- 10% higher Base clock: 3.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz
General
| Spec | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2024 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| Base TDP | 45 W | 15 W+67% |
| Max TDP | 115 W+283% | 30 W |
Cores & Clocks
| Spec | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 16+100% | 8 |
| Performance cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Efficiency cores | 10 | — |
| Threads | 16+100% | 8 |
| Base clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.2 GHz+10% |
| Boost clock | 5.4 GHz+59% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 cache | 24 MB+300% | 6 MB |
Integrated GPU
| Spec | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 |
|---|---|---|
| iGPU | Intel Arc 140T | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 |
| iGPU clock | 2,350 MHz | 1,250 MHz |
Memory
| Spec | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory support | LPDDR5X-8400 / DDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X-8448 |
| Max memory | 128 GB | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,080+28%Top 17% | 2,408Bottom 43% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 17,900+58%Top 15% | 11,303Bottom 51% |
| Cinebench R23 (single) | 2,180Top 10% | — |
| Cinebench R23 (multi) | 24,200Top 13% | — |
| PassMark | 34,203+92%Top 20% | 17,824Bottom 42% |
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU) | 3,719+305%Top 7% | 918Bottom 34% |
Related comparisons
Intel Core Ultra 9 285Hvs Intel Core Ultra 9 386HVSIntel Core Ultra 9 285Hvs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370VSIntel Core Ultra 9 285Hvs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-80-100VSIntel Core Ultra 9 285Hvs Intel Core Ultra 7 255HVSQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100vs AMD Ryzen 7 6800HVSQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100vs Apple M2 (8-core)VSQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100vs Intel Core i5-1335UVSQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100vs Intel Core i7-1260PVS

