Skip to content
InnoReviews

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Qualcomm Snapdragon C

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
66.4Inno Score
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon C
—Inno Score
74.7Single-core—
64.7Multi-core—
56Efficiencyspec-based73.3
75.9iGPU—
60.5Platformspec-based28.9
4 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 285H1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon C

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Qualcomm Snapdragon C lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

  • 100% higher cores: 16 vs 8
  • 100% higher threads: 16 vs 8
  • 80% higher Boost clock: 5.4 GHz vs 3 GHz
  • 50% lower process: 3 nm vs 6 nm

Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon C

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 285HQualcomm Snapdragon C
Announced20252026
Process3 nm+50%6 nm
Base TDP45 W—
Max TDP115 W—

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 285HQualcomm Snapdragon C
Cores16+100%8
Performance cores6—
Efficiency cores10—
Threads16+100%8
Base clock2.9 GHz—
Boost clock5.4 GHz+80%3 GHz
L3 cache24 MB—

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 285HQualcomm Snapdragon C
iGPUIntel Arc 140TQualcomm Adreno A643
iGPU clock2,350 MHz900 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 285HQualcomm Snapdragon C
Memory supportLPDDR5X-8400 / DDR5-6400—
Max memory128 GB—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 285HQualcomm Snapdragon C
Geekbench 6 (single)3,080Top 14%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)17,900Top 12%—
Cinebench R23 (single)2,180Top 8%—
Cinebench R23 (multi)24,200Top 12%—
PassMark34,203Top 18%—
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)3,719Top 7%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup