Skip to content
InnoReviews

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Qualcomm Snapdragon C

WINNER
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
63.7Inno Score
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon C
43.3Inno Score
71.8Single-core
58.6Multi-core
56Efficiency73.3
78iGPU20
60.5Platform28.9
5 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 285H1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon C

InnoReviews verdict

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H wins this laptop processor face-off, 63.7 to 43.3, pulling ahead mainly in iGPU (+58) and platform (+32). Qualcomm Snapdragon C still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

  • Stronger iGPU score: 78 vs 20
  • Stronger platform score: 61 vs 29
  • 161% higher iGPU clock: 2,350 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • 100% higher cores: 16 vs 8
  • 100% higher threads: 16 vs 8

Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon C

  • Stronger efficiency score: 73 vs 56

General

General comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 285HQualcomm Snapdragon C
Announced20252026
Process3 nm+50%6 nm
Base TDP45 W
Max TDP115 W

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 285HQualcomm Snapdragon C
Cores16+100%8
Performance cores6
Efficiency cores10
Threads16+100%8
Base clock2.9 GHz
Boost clock5.4 GHz+80%3 GHz
L3 cache24 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 285HQualcomm Snapdragon C
iGPUIntel Arc 140TQualcomm Adreno A643
iGPU clock2,350 MHz+161%900 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 285HQualcomm Snapdragon C
Memory supportLPDDR5X-8400 / DDR5-6400
Max memory128 GB

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 285HQualcomm Snapdragon C
Geekbench 6 (single)3,080Top 19%
Geekbench 6 (multi)17,900Top 19%
Cinebench R23 (single)2,180Top 13%
Cinebench R23 (multi)24,200Top 22%
PassMark36,800Top 23%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup