Intel Core Ultra 9 288V vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
66.6Single-core51.7
43.6Multi-core44.4
73.4Efficiencyspec-based88.6
76.9iGPU44.8
40.3Platformspec-based29.1
9 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 288V2 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
InnoReviews verdict
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V wins this laptop processor face-off, 56.6 to 50.6, pulling ahead mainly in iGPU (+32) and single-core (+15). Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
- Stronger single-core score: 67 vs 52
- Stronger iGPU score: 77 vs 45
- 323% higher 3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU): 3,883 vs 918
- 100% higher L3 cache: 12 MB vs 6 MB
- 50% higher Boost clock: 5.1 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
- 100% higher Performance cores: 8 vs 4
- 50% lower Base TDP: 15 W vs 30 W
General
| Spec | Intel Core Ultra 9 288V | Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2024 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| Base TDP | 30 W | 15 W+50% |
| Max TDP | 37 W+23% | 30 W |
Cores & Clocks
| Spec | Intel Core Ultra 9 288V | Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Performance cores | 4 | 8+100% |
| Efficiency cores | 4 | — |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock | 3.3 GHz+3% | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock | 5.1 GHz+50% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 cache | 12 MB+100% | 6 MB |
Integrated GPU
| Spec | Intel Core Ultra 9 288V | Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 |
|---|---|---|
| iGPU | Intel Arc 140V | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 |
| iGPU clock | 2,050 MHz | 1,250 MHz |
Memory
| Spec | Intel Core Ultra 9 288V | Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory support | LPDDR5X-8533 (on-package) | LPDDR5X-8448 |
| Max memory | 32 GB | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Intel Core Ultra 9 288V | Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,870+19%Top 26% | 2,408Bottom 43% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 11,500+2%Top 50% | 11,303Bottom 51% |
| Cinebench R23 (single) | 1,870Top 32% | — |
| Cinebench R23 (multi) | 10,900Bottom 46% | — |
| PassMark | 19,780+11%Bottom 50% | 17,824Bottom 42% |
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU) | 3,883+323%Top 4% | 918Bottom 34% |
Related comparisons
Intel Core Ultra 9 288Vvs AMD Ryzen 7 250VSIntel Core Ultra 9 288Vvs Apple M2 Pro (12-core)VSIntel Core Ultra 9 288Vvs Intel Core Ultra 9 185HVSIntel Core Ultra 9 288Vvs AMD Ryzen 7 8840UVSQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100vs AMD Ryzen 7 6800HVSQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100vs Apple M2 (8-core)VSQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100vs Intel Core i5-1335UVSQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100vs Intel Core i7-1260PVS

