Skip to content
InnoReviews

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H vs Intel Processor N150

WINNER
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
66.5Inno Score
VS
Intel Processor N150
34.1Inno Score
70.3Single-core29.5
60Multi-core22.8
81.4Efficiencyspec-based82.2
70iGPU22.9
58.2Platformspec-based27.6
15 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 386H1 spec wins — Intel Processor N150

InnoReviews verdict

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H wins this laptop processor face-off, 66.5 to 34.1, pulling ahead mainly in iGPU (+47) and single-core (+41). Intel Processor N150 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

  • Stronger single-core score: 70 vs 30
  • Stronger multi-core score: 60 vs 23
  • Stronger iGPU score: 70 vs 23
  • 732% higher 3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU): 2,846 vs 342
  • 700% higher Max memory: 128 GB vs 16 GB

Reasons to pick the Intel Processor N150

  • 76% lower Base TDP: 6 W vs 25 W

General

General comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H versus Intel Processor N150
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 386HIntel Processor N150
Announced20262025
Process2 nm+80%10 nm
Base TDP25 W6 W+76%
Max TDP80 W—

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H versus Intel Processor N150
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 386HIntel Processor N150
Cores16+300%4
Performance cores40
Efficiency cores12+200%4
Threads16+300%4
Base clock2.1 GHz—
Boost clock4.9 GHz+36%3.6 GHz
L3 cache18 MB+200%6 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H versus Intel Processor N150
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 386HIntel Processor N150
iGPUIntel Graphics (4 Xe3-cores)Intel Graphics (24 EU)
iGPU clock2,500 MHz1,000 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H versus Intel Processor N150
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 386HIntel Processor N150
Memory supportLPDDR5X, DDR5DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Max memory128 GB+700%16 GB

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H versus Intel Processor N150
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 386HIntel Processor N150
Geekbench 6 (single)2,876+136%Top 21%1,218Bottom 2%
Geekbench 6 (multi)16,298+472%Top 18%2,849Bottom 3%
Cinebench R23 (single)2,069+127%Top 14%912Bottom 6%
Cinebench R23 (multi)19,307+674%Top 18%2,494Bottom 4%
PassMark36,060+575%Top 16%5,344Bottom 5%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)2,846+732%Top 21%342Bottom 6%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup