Skip to content
InnoReviews

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H vs Qualcomm Snapdragon C

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
67.6Inno Score
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon C
—Inno Score
70Single-core—
58.6Multi-core—
81.4Efficiencyspec-based73.3
88.9iGPU—
56.4Platformspec-based28.9
4 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra X7 358H0 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon C

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Qualcomm Snapdragon C lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H

  • 100% higher cores: 16 vs 8
  • 100% higher threads: 16 vs 8
  • 67% lower process: 2 nm vs 6 nm
  • 60% higher Boost clock: 4.8 GHz vs 3 GHz

Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon C

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra X7 358HQualcomm Snapdragon C
Announced20262026
Process2 nm+67%6 nm
Base TDP25 W—
Max TDP80 W—

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra X7 358HQualcomm Snapdragon C
Cores16+100%8
Performance cores4—
Efficiency cores12—
Threads16+100%8
Base clock1.9 GHz—
Boost clock4.8 GHz+60%3 GHz
L3 cache18 MB—

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra X7 358HQualcomm Snapdragon C
iGPUIntel Arc B390Qualcomm Adreno A643
iGPU clock2,500 MHz900 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra X7 358HQualcomm Snapdragon C
Memory supportLPDDR5X-9600—
Max memory96 GB—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra X7 358HQualcomm Snapdragon C
Geekbench 6 (single)2,865Top 23%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)16,398Top 17%—
Cinebench R23 (single)2,061Top 15%—
Cinebench R23 (multi)18,086Top 23%—
PassMark33,516Top 19%—
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)6,664Top 2%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup