Skip to content
InnoReviews

AMD Ryzen 5 5500F vs Intel Core i9-14900KF

AMD Ryzen 5 5500F
—Inno Score
VS
Intel Core i9-14900KF
—Inno Score
—Multi-core88.8
43.6Gamingspec-based73.2
4 spec wins — AMD Ryzen 5 5500F8 spec wins — Intel Core i9-14900KF

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: AMD Ryzen 5 5500F and Intel Core i9-14900KF lack the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the AMD Ryzen 5 5500F

  • 48% lower Base TDP: 65 W vs 125 W
  • 30% lower process: 7 nm vs 10 nm
  • Has Cooler included — the other doesn't

Reasons to pick the Intel Core i9-14900KF

  • 967% higher L2 cache: 32 MB vs 3 MB
  • 300% higher cores: 24 vs 6
  • 167% higher threads: 32 vs 12
  • 125% higher L3 cache: 36 MB vs 16 MB
  • 50% higher Max memory: 192 GB vs 128 GB

General

General comparison: AMD Ryzen 5 5500F versus Intel Core i9-14900KF
SpecAMD Ryzen 5 5500FIntel Core i9-14900KF
Announced20262023
SocketAM4LGA1700
Process7 nm+30%10 nm
Base TDP65 W+48%125 W
Max turbo power—253 W
Unlocked multiplierYesYes
Cooler includedYesNo

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: AMD Ryzen 5 5500F versus Intel Core i9-14900KF
SpecAMD Ryzen 5 5500FIntel Core i9-14900KF
Cores624+300%
Performance cores—8
Efficiency cores—16
Threads1232+167%
Base clock3 GHz3.2 GHz+7%
Boost clock4.4 GHz6 GHz+36%
L2 cache3 MB32 MB+967%
L3 cache16 MB36 MB+125%

Memory

Memory comparison: AMD Ryzen 5 5500F versus Intel Core i9-14900KF
SpecAMD Ryzen 5 5500FIntel Core i9-14900KF
Memory supportDDR4-3200DDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200
Max memory128 GB192 GB+50%
Memory channels22

Platform

Platform comparison: AMD Ryzen 5 5500F versus Intel Core i9-14900KF
SpecAMD Ryzen 5 5500FIntel Core i9-14900KF
PCIe version45+25%
CPU PCIe lanes2020

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: AMD Ryzen 5 5500F versus Intel Core i9-14900KF
SpecAMD Ryzen 5 5500FIntel Core i9-14900KF
PassMark—58,069Top 11%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup