Skip to content
InnoReviews

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
35.5Inno Score
VS
WINNER
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
37.2Inno Score
24.4Rasterization26.4
20Ray Tracing20
32.4Memoryspec-based37.9
92.6Efficiencyspec-based88.3
27.9Compute33.7
3 spec wins — AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT7 spec wins — NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

InnoReviews verdict

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti wins this graphics card face-off, 37.2 to 35.5, pulling ahead mainly in compute (+6) and rasterization (+2). AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

  • 42% lower process: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • 14% higher Base clock: 1,717 MHz vs 1,500 MHz
  • Lower launch price: $169 vs $279

Reasons to pick the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

  • Stronger compute score: 34 vs 28
  • 50% higher VRAM: 6 GB vs 4 GB
  • 50% higher Bus width: 192 bit vs 128 bit
  • 39% higher PassMark G3D: 12,565 vs 9,047
  • 29% higher bandwidth: 288 GB/s vs 224 GB/s

General

General comparison: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
SpecAMD Radeon RX 5500 XTNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Announced20192019
ArchitectureRDNATuring
Process7 nm+42%12 nm
TDP130 W120 W+8%
Power connector1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
SpecAMD Radeon RX 5500 XTNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Shading units1,4081,536+9%
RT cores—0
Tensor / AI cores—0
Base clock1,717 MHz+14%1,500 MHz
Boost clock1,845 MHz+4%1,770 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
SpecAMD Radeon RX 5500 XTNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
VRAM4 GB6 GB+50%
VRAM typeGDDR6GDDR6
Bus width128 bit192 bit+50%
Bandwidth224 GB/s288 GB/s+29%

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
SpecAMD Radeon RX 5500 XTNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
3DMark Time Spy4,904Bottom 15%6,261+28%Bottom 23%
PassMark G3D9,047Bottom 9%12,565+39%Bottom 25%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup