Skip to content
InnoReviews

Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) vs ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)
40Inno Score
VS
WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
50.3Inno Score
44.2Performance44
38.3Display37.4
42.7Battery86.7
31Portability35.9
3 spec wins — Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)3 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

InnoReviews verdict

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 wins this laptop face-off, 50.3 to 40, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+44) and portability (+5). Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)

  • 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • 10% higher Peak brightness: 300 nits vs 273 nits
  • 10% lower thickness: 25.5 mm vs 28.2 mm

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 43
  • Stronger portability score: 36 vs 31
  • 78% higher charging: 240 W vs 135 W
  • 58% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 57 Wh

Display

Display comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPSIPS-level (G-Sync)
Resolution1920x12001920x1200
Refresh rate165 Hz165 Hz
Peak brightness300 nits+10%273 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
ProcessorAMD Ryzen 7 8845HSIntel Core i7-13650HX
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPUNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM)DDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM)
Storage1,024 GB+100%512 GB
Storage typePCIe Gen 4 NVMe SSD (2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Geekbench 6 (single)2,654Bottom 46%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)12,277Bottom 30%—

Battery

Battery comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Capacity57 Wh90 Wh+58%
Charging135 W240 W+78%

Design

Design comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Weight2.5 kg2.27 kg+9%
Thickness25.5 mm+10%28.2 mm
MaterialPlasticAluminum lid, plastic base

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Ports1x USB4 Type-C (40Gbps, DisplayPort), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet, 3.5mm combo jackThunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E (MediaTek RZ616)Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
Bluetooth5.35.2
Webcam720p720p HD
Biometrics—None

Software

Software comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup