Skip to content
InnoReviews

Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) vs ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)

Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)
40Inno Score
VS
WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
63.8Inno Score
44.2Performance62.7
38.3Display55
42.7Battery86.7
31Portability50.3
0 spec wins — Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)5 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)

InnoReviews verdict

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) wins this laptop face-off, 63.8 to 40, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+44) and portability (+19). Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)

  • Stronger performance score: 63 vs 44
  • Stronger display score: 55 vs 38
  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 43
  • Stronger portability score: 50 vs 31
  • 107% higher charging: 280 W vs 135 W

Display

Display comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPSIPS-level, anti-glare, 100% sRGB, G-Sync
Resolution1920x12002560x1600
Refresh rate165 Hz165 Hz
Peak brightness300 nits—

Performance

Performance comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
ProcessorAMD Ryzen 7 8845HSIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX (24C/24T, up to 5.4GHz)
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPUNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU, 115W (8GB GDDR7)
RAM16 GB32 GB+100%
RAM typeDDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM)DDR5-5600 SO-DIMM (2 slots, upgradeable to 64GB)
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typePCIe Gen 4 NVMe SSD (2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2x M.2 slots)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
Geekbench 6 (single)2,654Bottom 46%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)12,277Bottom 30%—

Battery

Battery comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
Capacity57 Wh90 Wh+58%
Charging135 W280 W+107%

Design

Design comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
Weight2.5 kg2.2 kg+12%
Thickness25.5 mm17.9 mm+30%
MaterialPlasticAluminum lid, MIL-STD-810H tested

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
Ports1x USB4 Type-C (40Gbps, DisplayPort), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet, 3.5mm combo jack1x Thunderbolt 4 (DisplayPort), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort / Power Delivery / G-SYNC), 3x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E (MediaTek RZ616)Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)
Bluetooth5.35.4
Webcam720p1080p FHD IR camera
Biometrics—IR camera with Windows Hello face recognition

Software

Software comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup