Skip to content
InnoReviews

Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) vs LG Gram 17 (2025)

Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)
40Inno Score
VS
WINNER
LG Gram 17 (2025)
52Inno Score
44.2Performance41.5
38.3Display24.9
42.7Battery79.8
31Portability76
4 spec wins — Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)5 spec wins — LG Gram 17 (2025)

InnoReviews verdict

LG Gram 17 (2025) wins this laptop face-off, 52 to 40, pulling ahead mainly in portability (+45) and battery (+37). Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)

  • Stronger display score: 38 vs 25
  • 175% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 108% higher charging: 135 W vs 65 W
  • 15% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 12,277 vs 10,700
  • Lower launch price: $1,000 vs $1,699

Reasons to pick the LG Gram 17 (2025)

  • Stronger battery score: 80 vs 43
  • Stronger portability score: 76 vs 31
  • 46% lower weight: 1.35 kg vs 2.5 kg
  • 35% higher capacity: 77 Wh vs 57 Wh
  • 30% lower thickness: 17.8 mm vs 25.5 mm

Display

Display comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Screen size16 ″17 ″+6%
Panel typeIPSIPS
Resolution1920x12002560x1600
Refresh rate165 Hz+175%60 Hz
Peak brightness300 nits350 nits+17%

Performance

Performance comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)LG Gram 17 (2025)
ProcessorAMD Ryzen 7 8845HSIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPUIntel Arc Graphics 140V
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM)LPDDR5X-8533 (on-package)
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typePCIe Gen 4 NVMe SSD (2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Geekbench 6 (single)2,654+1%Bottom 46%2,640Bottom 44%
Geekbench 6 (multi)12,277+15%Bottom 30%10,700Bottom 12%

Battery

Battery comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Capacity57 Wh77 Wh+35%
Web browsing endurance—16 h
Charging135 W+108%65 W

Design

Design comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Weight2.5 kg1.35 kg+46%
Thickness25.5 mm17.8 mm+30%
MaterialPlasticMagnesium alloy

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Ports1x USB4 Type-C (40Gbps, DisplayPort), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet, 3.5mm combo jack2x Thunderbolt 4, 2x USB-A, HDMI, microSD, 3.5mm
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E (MediaTek RZ616)Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
Webcam720p1080p
Biometrics—Fingerprint reader

Software

Software comparison: Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecAcer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-41)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup